Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.7384 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador stood at 0.7384 ha per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 4.9% on the previous year and down 2.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 1.02 ha per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.2142 ha per square kilometre, in 1983.
That places Ecuador 14th out of 126 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.4118 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.401 ha per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1963 | 0.4407 ha per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1964 | 0.6105 ha per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1965 | 0.7586 ha per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1966 | 0.6744 ha per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1967 | 0.7322 ha per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1968 | 0.7047 ha per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1969 | 0.6869 ha per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1970 | 0.6992 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1971 | 0.654 ha per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1972 | 0.6167 ha per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1973 | 0.5848 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1974 | 0.5483 ha per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1975 | 0.3968 ha per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1976 | 0.3876 ha per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1977 | 0.3632 ha per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1978 | 0.2776 ha per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1979 | 0.244 ha per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1980 | 0.2546 ha per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1981 | 0.2312 ha per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1982 | 0.2348 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 0.2142 ha per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1984 | 0.2191 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1985 | 0.2355 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1986 | 0.4039 ha per square kilometre | +71.5% |
| 1987 | 0.4317 ha per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1988 | 0.4596 ha per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1989 | 0.4719 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1990 | 0.5174 ha per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1991 | 0.4773 ha per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1992 | 0.668 ha per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1993 | 0.7354 ha per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1994 | 0.7993 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1995 | 0.8233 ha per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1996 | 0.8528 ha per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1997 | 0.8971 ha per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1998 | 0.8332 ha per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1999 | 0.7795 ha per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2000 | 1.02 ha per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2001 | 0.922 ha per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2002 | 0.9246 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 0.9414 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.9121 ha per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 0.8902 ha per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2006 | 0.8429 ha per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.7949 ha per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2008 | 0.8678 ha per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2009 | 0.8702 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 0.8683 ha per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0.773 ha per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0.8491 ha per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2013 | 0.7596 ha per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 0.7334 ha per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2015 | 0.7469 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 0.7261 ha per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.6364 ha per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2018 | 0.6506 ha per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 0.7382 ha per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2020 | 0.6468 ha per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2021 | 0.6818 ha per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2022 | 0.7037 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2023 | 0.7384 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6023 ha per square kilometre | 0.401 ha per square kilometre | 0.7586 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4772 ha per square kilometre | 0.244 ha per square kilometre | 0.6992 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3157 ha per square kilometre | 0.2142 ha per square kilometre | 0.4719 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7383 ha per square kilometre | 0.4773 ha per square kilometre | 0.8971 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8983 ha per square kilometre | 0.7949 ha per square kilometre | 1.02 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7482 ha per square kilometre | 0.6364 ha per square kilometre | 0.8683 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6927 ha per square kilometre | 0.6468 ha per square kilometre | 0.7384 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 11 Dominican Republic 0.8766 ha per square kilometre compare
- 12 Jamaica 0.8509 ha per square kilometre compare
- 13 Tonga 0.7903 ha per square kilometre compare
- 15 Philippines 0.6205 ha per square kilometre compare
- 16 Uganda 0.5906 ha per square kilometre compare
- 17 Malawi 0.5782 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 9.7 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 9.7 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 0.7384 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 1.02 ha per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2142 ha per square kilometre in 1983.
- How does Ecuador rank for bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 14th out of 126 countries with data for 2023.
- Is bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Bananas — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Bananas — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Bananas — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Bananas — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.