Asparagus — Gross Production Value in New Zealand
New Zealand: Asparagus — Gross Production Value was 1,093 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Asparagus — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, asparagus — gross production value in New Zealand stood at 1,093 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of down 14.3% on the previous year and down 48.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, asparagus — gross production value in New Zealand peaked at 13,029 1000 Int$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 993 1000 Int$, in 1962.
That places New Zealand 27th out of 46 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Asparagus — Gross Production Value in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,018 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 993 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 1963 | 2,138 1000 Int$ | +115.3% |
| 1964 | 2,138 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 2,036 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1966 | 1,597 1000 Int$ | -21.6% |
| 1967 | 1,780 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1968 | 1,823 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 2,028 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 1970 | 1,907 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 1971 | 1,801 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1972 | 1,826 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 1,996 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1974 | 1,382 1000 Int$ | -30.8% |
| 1975 | 1,852 1000 Int$ | +34.0% |
| 1976 | 1,648 1000 Int$ | -11.0% |
| 1977 | 1,280 1000 Int$ | -22.3% |
| 1978 | 1,161 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 1979 | 1,155 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 1980 | 1,166 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 1,600 1000 Int$ | +37.2% |
| 1982 | 1,917 1000 Int$ | +19.8% |
| 1983 | 3,899 1000 Int$ | +103.4% |
| 1984 | 4,072 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1985 | 4,275 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 4,886 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1987 | 5,598 1000 Int$ | +14.6% |
| 1988 | 6,107 1000 Int$ | +9.1% |
| 1989 | 7,125 1000 Int$ | +16.7% |
| 1990 | 8,143 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1991 | 10,179 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 1992 | 13,029 1000 Int$ | +28.0% |
| 1993 | 6,209 1000 Int$ | -52.3% |
| 1994 | 6,311 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1995 | 8,245 1000 Int$ | +30.6% |
| 1996 | 6,413 1000 Int$ | -22.2% |
| 1997 | 6,107 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 6,107 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 5,090 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 2000 | 4,581 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 2001 | 4,581 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 4,072 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 2003 | 5,395 1000 Int$ | +32.5% |
| 2004 | 6,107 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 2005 | 4,764 1000 Int$ | -22.0% |
| 2006 | 2,972 1000 Int$ | -37.6% |
| 2007 | 3,257 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2008 | 2,443 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 2009 | 2,239 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 2010 | 2,672 1000 Int$ | +19.3% |
| 2011 | 2,004 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 2012 | 2,786 1000 Int$ | +39.0% |
| 2013 | 2,327 1000 Int$ | -16.5% |
| 2014 | 2,116 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 2015 | 2,124 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 2,030 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 2017 | 2,519 1000 Int$ | +24.1% |
| 2018 | 1,928 1000 Int$ | -23.5% |
| 2019 | 2,073 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 2020 | 1,685 1000 Int$ | -18.7% |
| 2021 | 1,683 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 1,272 1000 Int$ | -24.4% |
| 2023 | 1,275 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 1,093 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,728 1000 Int$ | 993 1000 Int$ | 2,138 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1,601 1000 Int$ | 1,155 1000 Int$ | 1,996 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 4,064 1000 Int$ | 1,166 1000 Int$ | 7,125 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 7,583 1000 Int$ | 5,090 1000 Int$ | 13,029 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 4,041 1000 Int$ | 2,239 1000 Int$ | 6,107 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,258 1000 Int$ | 1,928 1000 Int$ | 2,786 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,402 1000 Int$ | 1,093 1000 Int$ | 1,685 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 24 China, Taiwan Province of 2,605 1000 Int$ compare
- 25 Ecuador 1,994 1000 Int$ compare
- 26 Belgium-Luxembourg 1,182 1000 Int$ compare
- 28 South Africa 851 1000 Int$ compare
- 29 Switzerland 791 1000 Int$ compare
- 30 North Macedonia 741 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is asparagus — gross production value in New Zealand?
- Asparagus — gross production value in New Zealand was 1,093 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest asparagus — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 13,029 1000 Int$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest asparagus — gross production value recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 993 1000 Int$ in 1962.
- How does New Zealand rank for asparagus — gross production value?
- New Zealand ranks 27th out of 46 countries with data for 2024.
- Is asparagus — gross production value rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Asparagus — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.