Arable land in Belarus
Belarus: Arable land was 27.4% in 2023. ▼ Falling
Arable land in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Measured in % of land area.
Analysis
In 2023, arable land in Belarus stood at 27.4%.
That represents a change of down 0.7% on the previous year and up 0.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, arable land in Belarus peaked at 30.7% in 1995 and was at its lowest, 27.2%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 36th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 32 years of available data.
Arable land in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % of land area | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 30.0% | — |
| 1993 | 30.1% | +0.3% |
| 1994 | 30.7% | +2.0% |
| 1995 | 30.7% | +0.1% |
| 1996 | 30.7% | -0.0% |
| 1997 | 30.4% | -0.9% |
| 1998 | 30.5% | +0.2% |
| 1999 | 30.5% | -0.1% |
| 2000 | 30.2% | -0.8% |
| 2001 | 28.4% | -6.1% |
| 2002 | 27.7% | -2.5% |
| 2003 | 27.5% | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 27.4% | -0.4% |
| 2005 | 27.3% | -0.1% |
| 2006 | 27.3% | -0.1% |
| 2007 | 27.2% | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 27.2% | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 27.3% | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 27.3% | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 27.2% | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 27.2% | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 27.4% | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 27.9% | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 28.0% | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 28.0% | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 28.2% | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 28.1% | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 28.1% | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 27.9% | -0.9% |
| 2021 | 27.7% | -0.6% |
| 2022 | 27.6% | -0.3% |
| 2023 | 27.4% | -0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.5% | 30.0% | 30.7% | 8 |
| 2000s | 27.7% | 27.2% | 30.2% | 10 |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 27.2% | 28.2% | 10 |
| 2020s | 27.7% | 27.4% | 27.9% | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is arable land in Belarus?
- Arable land in Belarus was 27.4% in 2023, according to FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
- What is the highest arable land recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 30.7% in 1995.
- What is the lowest arable land recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 27.2% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for arable land?
- Belarus ranks 36th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is arable land rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as part of Arable land (% of land area). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.