Arable land (hectares), per unit of GDP in Latvia
Latvia: Arable land (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Arable land (hectares), per unit of GDP in Latvia, 1995–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp in Latvia is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 29 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.0% on the previous year and down 23.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp in Latvia peaked at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Latvia 74th out of 203 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Arable land (hectares), per unit of GDP in Latvia, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.5% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +32.6% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +16.9% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 18.9× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 4.1× the median. (53 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp in Latvia?
- Arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp in Latvia was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Latvia rank for arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 74th out of 203 countries with data for 2023.
- Is arable land (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Arable land (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Arable land (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Arable land (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Arable land FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Arable land (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.