Statizoid

Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Rank
3rd
of 10 groups
All-time high
1 1000 t
in 2016
All-time low
-4 1000 t
in 2017
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-4-3-2-1012010201620232010: -2 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 1 1000 t2017: -4 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: -3 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, alcohol, non-food β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) stood at 0 1000 t.

Over the whole period, alcohol, non-food β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 1 1000 t in 2016 and was at its lowest, -4 1000 t, in 2017.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -0.5 1000 t -4 1000 t 1 1000 t 10
2020s -0.75 1000 t -3 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Senegal 1 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  4. 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  5. 2 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  6. 2 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  7. 2 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  8. 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  9. 2 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  10. 2 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  11. 2 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
  12. 2 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  13. 2 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓ­ncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  14. 2 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  15. 2 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  16. 2 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  17. 2 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  18. 2 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  19. 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  20. 2 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  21. 2 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  22. 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  23. 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  24. 2 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  25. 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  26. 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  27. 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  28. 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  29. 2 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  30. 2 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  31. 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  32. 2 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  33. 2 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  34. 2 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
  35. 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  36. 2 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  37. 2 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  38. 2 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  39. 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  40. 2 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  41. 2 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  42. 2 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  43. 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  44. 2 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  45. 2 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  46. 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  47. 2 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  48. 2 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  49. 2 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  50. 2 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  51. 2 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  52. 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  53. 2 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  54. 2 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  55. 2 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  56. 2 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  57. 2 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  58. 2 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  59. 2 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  60. 2 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  61. 2 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  62. 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  63. 2 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  64. 2 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  65. 2 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  66. 2 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  67. 2 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  68. 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  69. 2 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  70. 2 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  71. 2 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  72. 2 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  73. 2 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  74. 2 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  75. 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  76. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  77. 2 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  78. 2 Croatia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  79. 2 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  80. 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  81. 2 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  82. 2 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
  83. 2 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  84. 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  85. 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  86. 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  87. 2 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  88. 2 Slovenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  89. 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  90. 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  91. 2 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  92. 2 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  93. 2 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  94. 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  95. 2 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  96. 2 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  97. 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  98. 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  99. 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  100. 2 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  101. 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  102. 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  103. 2 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  104. 2 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  105. 2 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 2 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  107. 2 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  108. 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  109. 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  110. 2 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  111. 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  112. 2 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  113. 2 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  114. 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  115. 2 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  116. 2 France 0 1000 t compare
  117. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  118. 2 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  119. 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  120. 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  121. 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  122. 2 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  123. 2 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  124. 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  125. 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  126. 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  127. 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  128. 2 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  129. 2 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  130. 2 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  131. 2 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  132. 2 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  133. 2 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  134. 2 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  135. 2 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  136. 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  137. 2 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  138. 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  139. 2 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  140. 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  141. 2 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  142. 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  143. 2 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  144. 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  145. 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  146. 2 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  147. 2 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  148. 2 India 0 1000 t compare
  149. 2 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  150. 2 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  151. 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  152. 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  153. 2 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  154. 2 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  155. 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  156. 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  157. 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  158. 2 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  159. 2 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  160. 2 China, People's Republic of 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 209 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is alcohol, non-food β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Alcohol, non-food β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest alcohol, non-food β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 1 1000 t in 2016.
What is the lowest alcohol, non-food β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -4 1000 t in 2017.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for alcohol, non-food β€” residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd out of 10 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/alcohol-non-food-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/alcohol-non-food-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcohol, Non-Food β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 2,853 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.