Agriculture, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$ in Poland
Poland: Agriculture, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$ was 5,332 million USD in 2023. ▼ Falling
Agriculture, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$ in Poland, 2008–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million USD.
Analysis
Poland recorded 5,332 million USD for agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ in 2023. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
The figure is up 34.4% on the previous year and up 53.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ in Poland peaked at 5,332 million USD in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2,096 million USD, in 2016.
That places Poland 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 16 years of available data.
Agriculture, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$ in Poland, year by year
| Year | million USD | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 5,092 million USD | — |
| 2009 | 3,899 million USD | -23.4% |
| 2010 | 3,888 million USD | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 4,033 million USD | +3.7% |
| 2012 | 3,538 million USD | -12.3% |
| 2013 | 3,465 million USD | -2.1% |
| 2014 | 3,099 million USD | -10.6% |
| 2015 | 2,369 million USD | -23.5% |
| 2016 | 2,096 million USD | -11.5% |
| 2017 | 2,271 million USD | +8.3% |
| 2018 | 2,842 million USD | +25.2% |
| 2019 | 2,770 million USD | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 3,292 million USD | +18.9% |
| 2021 | 2,917 million USD | -11.4% |
| 2022 | 3,968 million USD | +36.0% |
| 2023 | 5,332 million USD | +34.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,495 million USD | 3,899 million USD | 5,092 million USD | 2 |
| 2010s | 3,037 million USD | 2,096 million USD | 4,033 million USD | 10 |
| 2020s | 3,877 million USD | 2,917 million USD | 5,332 million USD | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Brazil 7,299 million USD compare
- 2 Russian Federation 6,630 million USD compare
- 4 Australia 3,522 million USD compare
- 5 Colombia 1,240 million USD compare
- 6 South Africa 1,070 million USD compare
More agriculture & rural data for Poland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0245 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 697.32 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6232 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3991 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 2.45 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 2.45 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ in Poland?
- Agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ in Poland was 5,332 million USD in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 5,332 million USD in 2023.
- What is the lowest agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,096 million USD in 2016.
- How does Poland rank for agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, recurrent (general government expenditure) — value us$ rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Agriculture, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.