Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of

Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture production index was 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011. ▲ Rising

Latest (2011)
130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
Change on year
up 4.4%
World rank
11th
of 53 countries
All-time high
130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
All-time low
26.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 1961
Years of data
51
1961–2011

Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2011

255075100125196119862011

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Measured in gross, 1999-2001 = 100.

Analysis

In 2011, agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100. That is the highest value across all 51 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.4% on the previous year and up 71.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 26.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, in 1961.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 53 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 51 years of available data.

Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year

Annual values for Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100) in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961 to 2011.
Year gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Change
1961 26.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
1962 27.66 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.0%
1963 30.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +9.0%
1964 30.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +1.0%
1965 31.34 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +2.9%
1966 34.9 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +11.4%
1967 34.36 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -1.5%
1968 33.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -2.7%
1969 34.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.2%
1970 36.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.6%
1971 36.32 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -0.3%
1972 36.62 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +0.8%
1973 38.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.2%
1974 38.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +0.6%
1975 42.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +10.0%
1976 43.77 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.7%
1977 46.4 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +6.0%
1978 46.99 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +1.3%
1979 49.26 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.8%
1980 46.76 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -5.1%
1981 48.78 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.3%
1982 50.57 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.7%
1983 52.91 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.6%
1984 54.36 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +2.7%
1985 56.34 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.6%
1986 58.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.0%
1987 58.49 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -0.2%
1988 57.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -1.0%
1989 61.01 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +5.4%
1990 62.52 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +2.5%
1991 64.37 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.0%
1992 62.78 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -2.5%
1993 63.09 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +0.5%
1994 61.17 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -3.0%
1995 66.67 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +9.0%
1996 67.36 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +1.0%
1997 64.39 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -4.4%
1998 69.39 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +7.8%
1999 71.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.2%
2000 69.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -2.9%
2001 76.31 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +9.7%
2002 93.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +22.1%
2003 84.89 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -8.9%
2004 97.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +15.4%
2005 97.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 -0.8%
2006 104.92 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +8.0%
2007 105.19 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +0.3%
2008 106.85 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +1.6%
2009 110.02 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +3.0%
2010 125.04 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +13.7%
2011 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 +4.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 31.52 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 26.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 34.9 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 9
1970s 41.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 36.32 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 49.26 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 10
1980s 54.57 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 46.76 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 61.01 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 10
1990s 65.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 61.17 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 71.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 10
2000s 94.59 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 69.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 110.02 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 10
2010s 127.8 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 125.04 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 2

Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of

  1. 8 Guinea-Bissau 136.48 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare
  2. 9 Ethiopia 135.96 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare
  3. 10 Gabon 132.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare
  4. 12 Sierra Leone 129.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare
  5. 13 Algeria 129.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare
  6. 14 Congo 128.62 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 compare

See the full ranking of 54 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Tanzania, United Republic of

All data for Tanzania, United Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of was 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011, according to Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site.
What is the highest agriculture production index recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 130.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011.
What is the lowest agriculture production index recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 26.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 1961.
How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for agriculture production index?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
Is agriculture production index rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is up 71.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as part of Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/tanzania/">Agriculture production index in Tanzania, United Republic of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100)
Unit
gross, 1999-2001 = 100
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
54 places, 2,689 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 2004-2006 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 2004-2006. Since the FAO indices are based on the concept of agriculture as a single enterprise, amounts of seed and feed are subtracted from the production data to avoid double counting them, once in the production data and once with the crops or livestock produced from them. Deductions for seed (in the case of eggs, for hatching) and for livestock and poultry feed apply to both domestically produced and imported commodities. They cover only primary agricultural products destined to animal feed (e.g. maize, potatoes, milk, etc.). Processed and semi-processed feed items such as bran, oilcakes, meals and molasses have been completely excluded from the calculations at all stages. should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and nonfood production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group “crops” and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group “livestock products”. For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. The ”international commodity prices” are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These” international prices”, expressed in so-called ""international dollars”, are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single “price” to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no influence on the indices published. The commodities covered in the computation of indices of agricultural production are all crops and livestock products originating in each country. Practically all products are covered, with the main exception of fodder crops. The category of food production includes commodities that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Accordingly, coffee and tea are excluded along with inedible commodities because, although edible, they have practically no nutritive value. Aggregates are the sum of available data.