Agriculture production index in Rwanda
Rwanda: Agriculture production index was 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011. ▲ Rising
Agriculture production index in Rwanda, 1961–2011
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Measured in gross, 1999-2001 = 100.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 for agriculture production index in 2011. That is the highest value across all 51 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.6% on the previous year and up 92.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture production index in Rwanda peaked at 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 26.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, in 1963.
Rwanda ranks 3rd of 53 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 51 years of available data.
Agriculture production index in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 27.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | — |
| 1962 | 36.86 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +32.2% |
| 1963 | 26.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -27.1% |
| 1964 | 27 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.4% |
| 1965 | 30.35 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +12.4% |
| 1966 | 33.13 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +9.2% |
| 1967 | 40.08 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +21.0% |
| 1968 | 39.34 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 42.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +7.6% |
| 1970 | 44.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.6% |
| 1971 | 45.32 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +2.3% |
| 1972 | 44.37 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -2.1% |
| 1973 | 46.54 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.9% |
| 1974 | 44.67 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -4.0% |
| 1975 | 50.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +12.7% |
| 1976 | 53.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +6.1% |
| 1977 | 55.66 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.3% |
| 1978 | 56.5 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 60.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +7.7% |
| 1980 | 61.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.8% |
| 1981 | 67.19 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +9.6% |
| 1982 | 70.26 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.6% |
| 1983 | 70.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 64.69 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -8.1% |
| 1985 | 77.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +19.3% |
| 1986 | 70.93 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -8.1% |
| 1987 | 70.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -0.1% |
| 1988 | 68.68 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.0% |
| 1989 | 76.5 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +11.4% |
| 1990 | 73.65 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.7% |
| 1991 | 83.03 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +12.7% |
| 1992 | 86.66 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.4% |
| 1993 | 62.72 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -27.6% |
| 1994 | 42.98 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -31.5% |
| 1995 | 53.23 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +23.8% |
| 1996 | 59.04 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +10.9% |
| 1997 | 60.28 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +2.1% |
| 1998 | 67.64 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +12.2% |
| 1999 | 73.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +8.6% |
| 2000 | 82.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +12.2% |
| 2001 | 81.13 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.6% |
| 2002 | 98.81 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +21.8% |
| 2003 | 93.51 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -5.4% |
| 2004 | 93.56 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.1% |
| 2005 | 100.47 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +7.4% |
| 2006 | 105.98 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.5% |
| 2007 | 106.54 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 110.91 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.1% |
| 2009 | 136.28 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +22.9% |
| 2010 | 143.63 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.4% |
| 2011 | 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +8.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.76 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 26.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 42.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 9 |
| 1970s | 50.19 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 44.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 60.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 1980s | 69.8 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 61.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 77.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 1990s | 66.27 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 42.98 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 86.66 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 2000s | 100.96 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 81.13 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 136.28 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 2010s | 149.81 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 143.63 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
More agriculture & rural data for Rwanda
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 5.79 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 228.16 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.6953 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6909 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 20.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 20.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.9% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture production index in Rwanda?
- Agriculture production index in Rwanda was 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011, according to Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site.
- What is the highest agriculture production index recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 156 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011.
- What is the lowest agriculture production index recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.88 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 1963.
- How does Rwanda rank for agriculture production index?
- Rwanda ranks 3rd out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is agriculture production index rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 92.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as part of Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 2004-2006 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 2004-2006. Since the FAO indices are based on the concept of agriculture as a single enterprise, amounts of seed and feed are subtracted from the production data to avoid double counting them, once in the production data and once with the crops or livestock produced from them. Deductions for seed (in the case of eggs, for hatching) and for livestock and poultry feed apply to both domestically produced and imported commodities. They cover only primary agricultural products destined to animal feed (e.g. maize, potatoes, milk, etc.). Processed and semi-processed feed items such as bran, oilcakes, meals and molasses have been completely excluded from the calculations at all stages. should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and nonfood production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group “crops” and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group “livestock products”. For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. The ”international commodity prices” are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These” international prices”, expressed in so-called ""international dollars”, are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single “price” to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no influence on the indices published. The commodities covered in the computation of indices of agricultural production are all crops and livestock products originating in each country. Practically all products are covered, with the main exception of fodder crops. The category of food production includes commodities that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Accordingly, coffee and tea are excluded along with inedible commodities because, although edible, they have practically no nutritive value. Aggregates are the sum of available data.