2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product in Malawi

Malawi: 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product was 0.15 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.15
Change on year
down 84.0%
World rank
20th
of 65 countries
All-time high
1.7
in 2016
All-time low
-0.88
in 2020
Years of data
9
2015–2023

2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product in Malawi, 2015–2023

-10122015201920232015: -0.52016: 1.72017: 02018: 0.42019: -0.12020: -0.882021: -0.172022: 0.942023: 0.15

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Analysis

In 2023, 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product in Malawi stood at 0.15.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 84.0% on the previous year and up 130.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product in Malawi peaked at 1.7 in 2016 and was at its lowest, -0.88, in 2020.

That places Malawi 20th out of 65 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product in Malawi, year by year

Annual values for 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product: Rice — Value in Malawi, 2015 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2015 -0.5
2016 1.7 -440.0%
2017 0 -100.0%
2018 0.4
2019 -0.1 -125.0%
2020 -0.88 +780.0%
2021 -0.17 -80.7%
2022 0.94 -652.9%
2023 0.15 -84.0%

Malawi compared with similar countries

  • Malawi's 0.15 is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.15, 1.0× the median. (11 countries reporting)
  • Malawi's 0.15 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.31. (24 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.3 -0.5 1.7 5
2020s 0.01 -0.88 0.94 4

Countries ranked near Malawi

  1. 17 Indonesia 0.28 compare
  2. 18 Nicaragua 0.26 compare
  3. 19 Central African Republic 0.24 compare
  4. 21 Israel 0.1 compare
  5. 22 Sri Lanka 0.08 compare
  6. 23 Namibia 0.02 compare

See the full ranking of 72 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Malawi

All data for Malawi →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product in Malawi?
2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product in Malawi was 0.15 in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product recorded in Malawi?
The highest recorded value was 1.7 in 2016.
What is the lowest 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product recorded in Malawi?
The lowest recorded value was -0.88 in 2020.
How does Malawi rank for 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product?
Malawi ranks 20th out of 65 countries with data for 2023.
Is 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by type of product rising or falling in Malawi?
Over the last ten years it is up 130.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Malawi data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product: Rice — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product in Malawi. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/2-c-1-indicator-of-food-price-anomalies-ifpa-by-type-of-product-rice-value/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/2-c-1-indicator-of-food-price-anomalies-ifpa-by-type-of-product-rice-value/malawi/">2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product in Malawi</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by type of product: Rice — Value
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 699 data points, 2015–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.