2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value in Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands: 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value was -0.48 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value in Cayman Islands, 2010–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
In 2024, 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value in Cayman Islands stood at -0.48.
That represents a change of down 366.7% on the previous year and up 17.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value in Cayman Islands peaked at 0.9 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -2.03, in 2019.
Cayman Islands ranks 132nd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value in Cayman Islands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0.02 | — |
| 2011 | -0.47 | -2450.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08 | -117.0% |
| 2013 | -1.03 | -1387.5% |
| 2014 | -0.58 | -43.7% |
| 2015 | 0.83 | -243.1% |
| 2016 | -0.92 | -210.8% |
| 2017 | -1.41 | +53.3% |
| 2018 | -0.2 | -85.8% |
| 2019 | -2.03 | +915.0% |
| 2020 | 0.9 | -144.3% |
| 2021 | -0.44 | -148.9% |
| 2022 | -0.23 | -47.7% |
| 2023 | 0.18 | -178.3% |
| 2024 | -0.48 | -366.7% |
Cayman Islands compared with similar countries
- Cayman Islands's -0.48 is below the median for high income countries, which is -0.3, 1.6× the median. (63 countries reporting)
- Cayman Islands's -0.48 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.28, 1.7× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value in Cayman Islands changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | -2450.0% | 0.02 | -0.47 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.571 | -2.03 | 0.83 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.014 | -0.48 | 0.9 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cayman Islands
More agriculture & rural data for Cayman Islands
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 17.9 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
- Rural population 0 (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 0.5% (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 35.15 million current US$ (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.2% (2024)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.5% (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 472.08 current US$ per person (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value in Cayman Islands?
- 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value in Cayman Islands was -0.48 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value recorded in Cayman Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 0.9 in 2020.
- What is the lowest 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value recorded in Cayman Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.03 in 2019.
- How does Cayman Islands rank for 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value?
- Cayman Islands ranks 132nd out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
- Is 2.c.1 indicator of food price anomalies (ifpa), by food cpi — value rising or falling in Cayman Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cayman Islands data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.c.1 Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Food CPI — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.