2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo

Congo: 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures was 0.15 in 2018. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2018)
0.15
Change on year
up 15.4%
World rank
130th
of 175 countries
All-time high
0.75
in 2011
All-time low
0.13
in 2017
Years of data
18
2001–2018

2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo, 2001–2018

0.20.40.60.82001200920182001: 0.232002: 0.212003: 0.222004: 0.222005: 0.222006: 0.22007: 0.262008: 0.452009: 0.262010: 0.552011: 0.752012: 0.572013: 0.262014: 0.232015: 0.172016: 0.172017: 0.132018: 0.15

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo is 0.15, measured in 2018.

The figure is up 15.4% on the previous year and down 66.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo peaked at 0.75 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.13, in 2017.

That places Congo 130th out of 175 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo, year by year

Annual values for 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value in Congo, 2001 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2001 0.23
2002 0.21 -8.7%
2003 0.22 +4.8%
2004 0.22 +0.0%
2005 0.22 +0.0%
2006 0.2 -9.1%
2007 0.26 +30.0%
2008 0.45 +73.1%
2009 0.26 -42.2%
2010 0.55 +111.5%
2011 0.75 +36.4%
2012 0.57 -24.0%
2013 0.26 -54.4%
2014 0.23 -11.5%
2015 0.17 -26.1%
2016 0.17 +0.0%
2017 0.13 -23.5%
2018 0.15 +15.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2522 0.2 0.45 9
2010s 0.3311 0.13 0.75 9

Countries ranked near Congo

  1. 128 Guatemala 0.16 compare
  2. 128 Nigeria 0.16 compare
  3. 130 Myanmar 0.15 compare
  4. 132 Brazil 0.14 compare
  5. 132 Cameroon 0.14 compare
  6. 132 Kyrgyzstan 0.14 compare

See the full ranking of 227 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Congo

All data for Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo?
2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo was 0.15 in 2018, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures recorded in Congo?
The highest recorded value was 0.75 in 2011.
What is the lowest 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures recorded in Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 0.13 in 2017.
How does Congo rank for 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures?
Congo ranks 130th out of 175 countries with data for 2018.
Is 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures rising or falling in Congo?
Over the last ten years it is down 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Congo data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/2-a-1-agriculture-orientation-index-for-government-expenditures-value/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/2-a-1-agriculture-orientation-index-for-government-expenditures-value/congo-rep/">2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures in Congo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.a.1 Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures — Value
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 4,886 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.