2.4.1 [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia
Southern Asia: 2.4.1 [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture was 2.91 Score in 2024. ▬ Flat
2.4.1 [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in Score.
Analysis
Southern Asia recorded 2.91 Score for 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in 2024. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia peaked at 2.91 Score in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2.75 Score, in 2015.
Southern Asia ranks 20th of 33 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
2.4.1 [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia, year by year
| Year | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2.75 Score | — |
| 2016 | 2.84 Score | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 2.84 Score | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.81 Score | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 2.86 Score | +1.8% |
| 2020 | 2.78 Score | -2.8% |
| 2021 | 2.84 Score | +2.2% |
| 2022 | 2.9 Score | +2.1% |
| 2023 | 2.91 Score | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 2.91 Score | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.82 Score | 2.75 Score | 2.86 Score | 5 |
| 2020s | 2.87 Score | 2.78 Score | 2.91 Score | 5 |
Countries ranked near Southern Asia
- 17 China, mainland 4.17 Score compare
- 17 Japan 4.17 Score compare
- 17 Timor-Leste 2.17 Score compare
- 18 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.14 Score compare
- 19 Denmark 4.14 Score compare
- 19 Romania 4.14 Score compare
- 19 Spain 4.14 Score compare
- 22 Bulgaria 4 Score compare
- 22 Greece 4 Score compare
- 22 Guatemala 4 Score compare
- 22 Morocco 4 Score compare
- 22 Poland 4 Score compare
- 22 Portugal 4 Score compare
- 22 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4 Score compare
- 22 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 4 Score compare
More agriculture & rural data for Southern Asia
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing -1.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 3.56 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Production, annual growth rate -6.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Yield, annual growth rate -0.0697 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Production, annual growth rate -0.7718 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 1.91 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate 1.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate 3.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual 2.01 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate -0.1606 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia?
- 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture in Southern Asia was 2.91 Score in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture recorded in Southern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.91 Score in 2023.
- What is the lowest 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture recorded in Southern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.75 Score in 2015.
- How does Southern Asia rank for 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture?
- Southern Asia ranks 20th out of 33 groups with data for 2024.
- Is 2.4.1 [proxy] progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture rising or falling in Southern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Southern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.4.1 [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, current status score — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.