2.1.2 Prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa
Eastern Africa: 2.1.2 Prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) was 21 % in 2025. ▲ Rising
2.1.2 Prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa, 2014–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Eastern Africa recorded 21 % for 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.4% on the previous year and up 4.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa peaked at 25.4 % in 2021 and was at its lowest, 19.9 %, in 2014.
Eastern Africa ranks 3rd of 33 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
2.1.2 Prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 19.9 % | — |
| 2015 | 20.1 % | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 23.6 % | +17.4% |
| 2017 | 24 % | +1.7% |
| 2018 | 22.2 % | -7.5% |
| 2019 | 22.9 % | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 25.3 % | +10.5% |
| 2021 | 25.4 % | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 23.8 % | -6.3% |
| 2023 | 22.7 % | -4.6% |
| 2024 | 23.7 % | +4.4% |
| 2025 | 21 % | -11.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.12 % | 19.9 % | 24 % | 6 |
| 2020s | 23.65 % | 21 % | 25.4 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Eastern Africa
- 1 Democratic Republic of the Congo 41.7 % compare
- 1 South Sudan 61.2 % compare
- 2 Malawi 56.6 % compare
- 3 Haiti 42.2 % compare
- 3 Melanesia 23.4 % compare
- 4 Liberia 33 % compare
- 4 United Republic of Tanzania 21.2 % compare
- 4 Caribbean 20.3 % compare
- 5 Sierra Leone 27.9 % compare
- 6 Namibia 26.2 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Eastern Africa
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.076 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Production, annual growth rate 0.1136 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Yield, annual growth rate -0.1042 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.2182 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Production, annual -0.6405 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Yield, annual 1.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested -1.94 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 6.49 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 6.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 0 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa?
- 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) in Eastern Africa was 21 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) recorded in Eastern Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 25.4 % in 2021.
- What is the lowest 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) recorded in Eastern Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 19.9 % in 2014.
- How does Eastern Africa rank for 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no)?
- Eastern Africa ranks 3rd out of 33 groups with data for 2025.
- Is 2.1.2 prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no) rising or falling in Eastern Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eastern Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.1.2 Prevalence of severe food insecurity (both sexes or no breakdown by sex) (all age ranges or no breakdown by age) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.