2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia
North Macedonia: 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) was 126.8 1000 No in 2024. ▬ Flat
2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia is 126.8 1000 No, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is down 46.2% on the previous year and down 48.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia peaked at 405.2 1000 No in 2021 and was at its lowest, 126.8 1000 No, in 2024.
That places North Macedonia 109th out of 111 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia, year by year
| Year | 1000 No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 244.2 1000 No | — |
| 2016 | 217.4 1000 No | -11.0% |
| 2017 | 225.7 1000 No | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 225.8 1000 No | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 286.2 1000 No | +26.7% |
| 2020 | 346.9 1000 No | +21.2% |
| 2021 | 405.2 1000 No | +16.8% |
| 2022 | 328.2 1000 No | -19.0% |
| 2023 | 235.5 1000 No | -28.2% |
| 2024 | 126.8 1000 No | -46.2% |
North Macedonia compared with similar countries
- North Macedonia's 126.8 1000 No is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2,404 1000 No, 5% of the median. (31 countries reporting)
- North Macedonia's 126.8 1000 No is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 488.3 1000 No, 26% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 239.86 1000 No | 217.4 1000 No | 286.2 1000 No | 5 |
| 2020s | 288.52 1000 No | 126.8 1000 No | 405.2 1000 No | 5 |
Countries ranked near North Macedonia
More agriculture & rural data for North Macedonia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0598 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 626.97 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.06 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3711 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia?
- 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in North Macedonia was 126.8 1000 No in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The highest recorded value was 405.2 1000 No in 2021.
- What is the lowest 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 126.8 1000 No in 2024.
- How does North Macedonia rank for 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both)?
- North Macedonia ranks 109th out of 111 countries with data for 2024.
- Is 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) rising or falling in North Macedonia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both sexes or no breakdown by sex) (all age ranges or no breakdown by age) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.