2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia
Latvia: 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) was 178.3 1000 No in 2024. ▬ Flat
2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia is 178.3 1000 No, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.8% on the previous year and up 10.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia peaked at 178.3 1000 No in 2024 and was at its lowest, 133.7 1000 No, in 2021.
Latvia ranks 103rd of 111 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 161.3 1000 No | — |
| 2016 | 153.4 1000 No | -4.9% |
| 2017 | 151.3 1000 No | -1.4% |
| 2018 | 150.4 1000 No | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 163.4 1000 No | +8.6% |
| 2020 | 143.9 1000 No | -11.9% |
| 2021 | 133.7 1000 No | -7.1% |
| 2022 | 144.7 1000 No | +8.2% |
| 2023 | 163.9 1000 No | +13.3% |
| 2024 | 178.3 1000 No | +8.8% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 178.3 1000 No is below the median for high income countries, which is 643.8 1000 No, 28% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 178.3 1000 No is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 488.3 1000 No, 37% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 155.96 1000 No | 150.4 1000 No | 163.4 1000 No | 5 |
| 2020s | 152.9 1000 No | 133.7 1000 No | 178.3 1000 No | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 100 Austria 269.7 1000 No compare
- 101 Ireland 251.7 1000 No compare
- 102 Bosnia and Herzegovina 222.5 1000 No compare
- 104 Kazakhstan 177.5 1000 No compare
- 105 Armenia 173.1 1000 No compare
- 106 Switzerland 172.9 1000 No compare
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia?
- 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) in Latvia was 178.3 1000 No in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 178.3 1000 No in 2024.
- What is the lowest 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 133.7 1000 No in 2021.
- How does Latvia rank for 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both)?
- Latvia ranks 103rd out of 111 countries with data for 2024.
- Is 2.1.2 number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.1.2 Number of moderately or severely food insecure people (both sexes or no breakdown by sex) (all age ranges or no breakdown by age) — Confidence interval: Lower bound. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.