Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0049 animals per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0048 animals per person
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
168th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
169th

Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0049 animals per person against 0.0048 animals per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0001 animals per person.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 168th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0184 animals per person 0.0146 animals per person 0.0039 animals per person Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0238 animals per person 0.0155 animals per person 0.0083 animals per person Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0431 animals per person 0.015 animals per person 0.028 animals per person Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0212 animals per person 0.014 animals per person 0.0072 animals per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0118 animals per person 0.0135 animals per person 0.0017 animals per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0077 animals per person 0.0064 animals per person 0.0013 animals per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0041 animals per person 0.0051 animals per person 0.001 animals per person Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0049 animals per person against 0.0048 animals per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0001 animals per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 168th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/yearly-number-of-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/yearly-number-of-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat, per capita
Unit
animals per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 11,039 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Yearly number of animals slaughtered for meat divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.