Polynesia vs Rwanda: Yams — Residuals

Polynesia
0 1000 t
in 2023
Rwanda
0 1000 t
in 2023
Polynesia rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
2nd

Yams — Residuals over time

  • Polynesia
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Polynesia currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1000 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Polynesia ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 2nd of 130 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher yams — residuals, Polynesia or Rwanda?
Polynesia, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in yams — residuals between Polynesia and Rwanda?
0 1000 t, with Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Rwanda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Polynesia and Rwanda rank globally for yams — residuals?
Polynesia ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 2nd of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Yams — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Yams — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
161 places, 1,956 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.