Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Yams — Protein supply quantity

Australia and New Zealand
16.02 t
in 2023
Nicaragua
14.42 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
52nd
Nicaragua rank
53rd

Yams — Protein supply quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
0102030201020162023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 16.02 t against 14.42 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 1.6 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 52nd and Nicaragua ranks 53rd of 113 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2010s 14.01 t 17.95 t 3.94 t Nicaragua
2020s 18.48 t 12.47 t 6 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher yams — protein supply quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Nicaragua?
Australia and New Zealand, at 16.02 t against 14.42 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in yams — protein supply quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
1.6 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua rank globally for yams — protein supply quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 52nd and Nicaragua ranks 53rd of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Yams — Protein supply quantity (t). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Yams — Protein supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/yams-protein-supply-quantity-t/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/yams-protein-supply-quantity-t/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/">Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Yams — Protein supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Yams — Protein supply quantity (t)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
142 places, 1,790 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.