Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production

Southern Africa
90,632 t
in 2013
Uruguay
53,062 t
in 2013
Southern Africa rank
18th
Uruguay rank
17th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production over time

  • Southern Africa
  • Uruguay
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119872013

How they compare

Southern Africa currently reports 90,632 t against 53,062 t in Uruguay, a difference of 37,570 t.

That makes Southern Africa's figure about 1.7 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Southern Africa ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 26 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Africa Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 229,105 t 131,475 t 97,629 t Southern Africa
1970s 187,683 t 102,442 t 85,241 t Southern Africa
1980s 162,507 t 128,228 t 34,279 t Southern Africa
1990s 122,652 t 128,633 t 5,981 t Uruguay
2000s 84,920 t 69,693 t 15,227 t Southern Africa
2010s 82,894 t 52,346 t 30,548 t Southern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — production, Southern Africa or Uruguay?
Southern Africa, at 90,632 t against 53,062 t in Uruguay as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — production between Southern Africa and Uruguay?
37,570 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uruguay?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Southern Africa and Uruguay rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — production?
Southern Africa ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/southern-africa/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/southern-africa/uruguay/">Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 5,812 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.