Land Locked Developing Countries vs T�rkiye: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production

Land Locked Developing Countries
322,541 t
in 2013
T�rkiye
76,684 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
9th
T�rkiye rank
10th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • T�rkiye
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119872013

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries currently reports 322,541 t against 76,684 t in T�rkiye, a difference of 245,857 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries's figure about 4.2 times T�rkiye's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 9th and T�rkiye ranks 10th of 29 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 5 and T�rkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries T�rkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 85,551 t 69,359 t 16,192 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1970s 87,602 t 81,829 t 5,774 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1980s 78,433 t 96,218 t 17,785 t T�rkiye
1990s 258,961 t 73,814 t 185,147 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2000s 265,026 t 61,483 t 203,542 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 315,580 t 68,368 t 247,212 t Land Locked Developing Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — production, Land Locked Developing Countries or T�rkiye?
Land Locked Developing Countries, at 322,541 t against 76,684 t in T�rkiye as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — production between Land Locked Developing Countries and T�rkiye?
245,857 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and T�rkiye?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and T�rkiye rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — production?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 9th and T�rkiye ranks 10th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs T�rkiye: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/land-locked-developing-countries/t-rkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/land-locked-developing-countries/t-rkiye/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs T�rkiye: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 5,812 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.