European Union (27) vs Germany: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity

European Union (27)
176,390 t
in 2013
Germany
36,695 t
in 2013
European Union (27) rank
5th
Germany rank
5th

Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity over time

  • European Union (27)
  • Germany
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119872013

How they compare

European Union (27) currently reports 176,390 t against 36,695 t in Germany, a difference of 139,695 t.

That makes European Union (27)'s figure about 4.8 times Germany's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, European Union (27) has been ahead every year.

European Union (27) ranks 5th and Germany ranks 5th of 31 groups.

European Union (27) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union (27) Germany Difference Ahead
1960s 585,653 t 122,155 t 463,498 t European Union (27)
1970s 491,162 t 100,550 t 390,611 t European Union (27)
1980s 440,246 t 86,854 t 353,392 t European Union (27)
1990s 417,136 t 78,262 t 338,874 t European Union (27)
2000s 282,658 t 47,524 t 235,134 t European Union (27)
2010s 174,345 t 36,754 t 137,591 t European Union (27)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity, European Union (27) or Germany?
European Union (27), at 176,390 t against 36,695 t in Germany as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity between European Union (27) and Germany?
139,695 t, with European Union (27) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) and Germany?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do European Union (27) and Germany rank globally for wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity?
European Union (27) ranks 5th and Germany ranks 5th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union (27) vs Germany: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-import-quantity/european-union-27/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-import-quantity/european-union-27/germany/">European Union (27) vs Germany: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
161 places, 7,582 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.