Egypt vs Least Developed Countries: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity

Egypt
5,570 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries
3,621 t
in 2013
Egypt rank
22nd
Least Developed Countries rank
21st

Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity over time

  • Egypt
  • Least Developed Countries
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119872013

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 5,570 t against 3,621 t in Least Developed Countries, a difference of 1,949 t.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.5 times Least Developed Countries's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 22nd and Least Developed Countries ranks 21st of 130 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Least Developed Countries in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Least Developed Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 2,634 t 2.78 t 2,632 t Egypt
1970s 6,913 t 127 t 6,786 t Egypt
1980s 5,515 t 1,674 t 3,842 t Egypt
1990s 3,688 t 12,626 t 8,938 t Least Developed Countries
2000s 898.1 t 10,383 t 9,485 t Least Developed Countries
2010s 3,389 t 4,006 t 617.25 t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity, Egypt or Least Developed Countries?
Egypt, at 5,570 t against 3,621 t in Least Developed Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity between Egypt and Least Developed Countries?
1,949 t, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Least Developed Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Egypt and Least Developed Countries rank globally for wool (clean eq.) β€” import quantity?
Egypt ranks 22nd and Least Developed Countries ranks 21st of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Least Developed Countries: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-import-quantity/egypt-arab-rep/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-import-quantity/egypt-arab-rep/least-developed-countries/">Egypt vs Least Developed Countries: Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
161 places, 7,582 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.