Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity

Chile
3,914 t
in 2013
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
4,707 t
in 2013
Chile rank
30th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
28th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity over time

  • Chile
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119872013

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 4,707 t against 3,914 t in Chile, a difference of 793 t.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 30th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 28th of 113 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1960s 7,403 t 4,927 t 2,475 t Chile
1970s 6,958 t 4,422 t 2,537 t Chile
1980s 9,593 t 7,058 t 2,535 t Chile
1990s 4,786 t 3,790 t 995.1 t Chile
2000s 4,262 t 2,033 t 2,229 t Chile
2010s 3,850 t 3,421 t 429.75 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — export quantity, Chile or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 4,707 t against 3,914 t in Chile as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — export quantity between Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
793 t, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — export quantity?
Chile ranks 30th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 28th of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-export-quantity/chile/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-export-quantity/chile/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
148 places, 6,851 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.