Middle Africa vs Sudan (former): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity

Middle Africa
16 t
in 2013
Sudan (former)
80,200 t
in 2011
Middle Africa rank
8th
Sudan (former) rank
9th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Sudan (former)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Sudan (former) currently reports 80,200 t against 16 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 80,184 t.

That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 5,012.5 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 8th and Sudan (former) ranks 9th of 11 groups.

Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 12,596 t 12,596 t Sudan (former)
1970s 0 t 18,548 t 18,548 t Sudan (former)
1980s 0 t 22,380 t 22,380 t Sudan (former)
1990s 0 t 52,200 t 52,200 t Sudan (former)
2000s -10.2 t 73,721 t 73,731 t Sudan (former)
2010s 0 t 80,200 t 80,200 t Sudan (former)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity, Middle Africa or Sudan (former)?
Sudan (former), at 80,200 t against 16 t in Middle Africa as of 2011.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity between Middle Africa and Sudan (former)?
80,184 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Sudan (former)?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Middle Africa and Sudan (former) rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity?
Middle Africa ranks 8th and Sudan (former) ranks 9th of 11 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Sudan (former): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/middle-africa/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/middle-africa/sudan-former/">Middle Africa vs Sudan (former): Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 7,903 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.