Mexico vs Southern Africa: Wine — Processing
Wine — Processing over time
- Mexico
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 395 1000 t against 109 1000 t in Mexico, a difference of 286 1000 t.
That makes Southern Africa's figure about 3.6 times Mexico's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Southern Africa has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 7th of 16 countries.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.5 1000 t | 284.1 1000 t | 198.6 1000 t | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 103 1000 t | 439.75 1000 t | 336.75 1000 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wine — processing, Mexico or Southern Africa?
- Southern Africa, at 395 1000 t against 109 1000 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wine — processing between Mexico and Southern Africa?
- 286 1000 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Southern Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Southern Africa rank globally for wine — processing?
- Mexico ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 7th of 16 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wine — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.