Belize vs Cuba: Wild fish catch by gear type
Belize
1,289 tonnes
in 2018
Cuba
1,922 tonnes
in 2012
Belize rank
91st
Cuba rank
88th
Wild fish catch by gear type over time
- Belize
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1,922 tonnes against 1,289 tonnes in Belize, a difference of 633 tonnes.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.5 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.
Belize ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 88th of 111 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,597 tonnes | 17,316 tonnes | 13,719 tonnes | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2,566 tonnes | 613.34 tonnes | 1,953 tonnes | Belize |
| 2010s | 1,351 tonnes | 2,403 tonnes | 1,052 tonnes | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch by gear type, Belize or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 1,922 tonnes against 1,289 tonnes in Belize as of 2012.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch by gear type between Belize and Cuba?
- 633 tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Cuba?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2012.
- How do Belize and Cuba rank globally for wild fish catch by gear type?
- Belize ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 88th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch by gear type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.