Saudi Arabia vs Tuvalu: Wild fish allocation
Saudi Arabia
127.83
in 2015
Tuvalu
132.07
in 2015
Saudi Arabia rank
55th
Tuvalu rank
54th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 132.07 against 127.83 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 4.24.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 55th and Tuvalu ranks 54th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1.91 | 4.48 | 2.57 | Tuvalu |
| 1960s | 4.52 | 16.94 | 12.42 | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 5.57 | 28.56 | 22.99 | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 17.4 | 37.8 | 20.4 | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 56.83 | 54.86 | 1.98 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 93.11 | 81.36 | 11.75 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 126.16 | 128.83 | 2.67 | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Saudi Arabia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 132.07 against 127.83 in Saudi Arabia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Saudi Arabia and Tuvalu?
- 4.24, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tuvalu?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Tuvalu rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 55th and Tuvalu ranks 54th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.