Puerto Rico vs Romania: Wild fish allocation
Puerto Rico
0.2781
in 2015
Romania
0.1916
in 2015
Puerto Rico rank
115th
Romania rank
118th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Puerto Rico
- Romania
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0.2781 against 0.1916 in Romania, a difference of 0.0865.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.5 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Romania ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 115th and Romania ranks 118th of 140 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.2428 | 4.68 | 4.44 | Romania |
| 1960s | 0.2853 | 30.45 | 30.16 | Romania |
| 1970s | 0.2698 | 146.18 | 145.91 | Romania |
| 1980s | 0.1944 | 145 | 144.8 | Romania |
| 1990s | 0.184 | 48.84 | 48.66 | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.1551 | 33.26 | 33.11 | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1608 | 6.73 | 6.57 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Puerto Rico or Romania?
- Puerto Rico, at 0.2781 against 0.1916 in Romania as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Puerto Rico and Romania?
- 0.0865, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Romania?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Puerto Rico and Romania rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Puerto Rico ranks 115th and Romania ranks 118th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.