Oman vs Sri Lanka: What is wild fish catch used for?
Oman
91.15 tonnes
in 2015
Sri Lanka
104.95 tonnes
in 2015
Oman rank
62nd
Sri Lanka rank
60th
What is wild fish catch used for? over time
- Oman
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 104.95 tonnes against 91.15 tonnes in Oman, a difference of 13.8 tonnes.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 18.58 tonnes | 11.75 tonnes | 6.83 tonnes | Oman |
| 1960s | 27.54 tonnes | 25.67 tonnes | 1.87 tonnes | Oman |
| 1970s | 38.87 tonnes | 33.73 tonnes | 5.13 tonnes | Oman |
| 1980s | 41.16 tonnes | 47.17 tonnes | 6 tonnes | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 40.89 tonnes | 42.28 tonnes | 1.39 tonnes | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 40.12 tonnes | 54.73 tonnes | 14.61 tonnes | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 56.5 tonnes | 89.27 tonnes | 32.76 tonnes | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Oman or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 104.95 tonnes against 91.15 tonnes in Oman as of 2015.
- What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 13.8 tonnes, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Oman and Sri Lanka rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
- Oman ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.