New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Wild fish allocation
New Zealand
184.51
in 2015
Saudi Arabia
127.83
in 2015
New Zealand rank
52nd
Saudi Arabia rank
55th
Wild fish allocation over time
- New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 184.51 against 127.83 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 56.68.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 52nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 55th of 138 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 35.69 | 1.91 | 33.78 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 48.19 | 4.52 | 43.67 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 72.94 | 5.57 | 67.37 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 120.62 | 17.4 | 103.22 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 146.81 | 56.83 | 89.98 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 148.32 | 93.11 | 55.21 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 149.2 | 126.16 | 23.04 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- New Zealand, at 184.51 against 127.83 in Saudi Arabia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 56.68, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- New Zealand ranks 52nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 55th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.