New Zealand vs Poland: Wild fish allocation
New Zealand
184.51
in 2015
Poland
201.6
in 2015
New Zealand rank
52nd
Poland rank
50th
Wild fish allocation over time
- New Zealand
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 201.6 against 184.51 in New Zealand, a difference of 17.09.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 50th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 35.69 | 33.19 | 2.51 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 48.19 | 96.57 | 48.37 | Poland |
| 1970s | 72.94 | 327.38 | 254.44 | Poland |
| 1980s | 120.62 | 230.42 | 109.8 | Poland |
| 1990s | 146.81 | 141.45 | 5.37 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 148.32 | 124.39 | 23.92 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 149.2 | 168.85 | 19.65 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, New Zealand or Poland?
- Poland, at 201.6 against 184.51 in New Zealand as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between New Zealand and Poland?
- 17.09, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Poland?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do New Zealand and Poland rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- New Zealand ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 50th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.