New Zealand vs Philippines: Wild fish allocation
New Zealand
184.51
in 2015
Philippines
145.83
in 2015
New Zealand rank
52nd
Philippines rank
53rd
Wild fish allocation over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 184.51 against 145.83 in Philippines, a difference of 38.68.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 53rd of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 35.69 | 27.48 | 8.22 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 48.19 | 47.94 | 0.2514 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 72.94 | 78.36 | 5.42 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 120.62 | 119.19 | 1.43 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 146.81 | 148.56 | 1.75 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 148.32 | 158.75 | 10.43 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 149.2 | 154.89 | 5.69 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 184.51 against 145.83 in Philippines as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 38.68, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- New Zealand ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 53rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.