Marshall Islands vs Sri Lanka: Wild fish allocation
Marshall Islands
93.45
in 2015
Sri Lanka
104.95
in 2015
Marshall Islands rank
61st
Sri Lanka rank
60th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Marshall Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 104.95 against 93.45 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 11.5.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 11.1 | 11.75 | 0.6545 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 22.61 | 25.67 | 3.06 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 33.63 | 33.73 | 0.0995 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 44.03 | 47.17 | 3.14 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 56.57 | 42.28 | 14.29 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 69.61 | 54.73 | 14.89 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 85.47 | 89.27 | 3.8 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Marshall Islands or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 104.95 against 93.45 in Marshall Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Marshall Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 11.5, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Marshall Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Marshall Islands ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.