Malta vs Uruguay: What is wild fish catch used for?
Malta
38.28 tonnes
in 2015
Uruguay
36.51 tonnes
in 2015
Malta rank
76th
Uruguay rank
78th
What is wild fish catch used for? over time
- Malta
- Uruguay
How they compare
Malta currently reports 38.28 tonnes against 36.51 tonnes in Uruguay, a difference of 1.77 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Uruguay ahead.
Malta ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 140 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.9945 tonnes | 2.47 tonnes | 1.48 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 1.35 tonnes | 5.84 tonnes | 4.5 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 6.67 tonnes | 20.49 tonnes | 13.82 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 10.94 tonnes | 66.13 tonnes | 55.19 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 20.48 tonnes | 64.37 tonnes | 43.89 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 27.16 tonnes | 60.5 tonnes | 33.34 tonnes | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 38.05 tonnes | 44.25 tonnes | 6.2 tonnes | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Malta or Uruguay?
- Malta, at 38.28 tonnes against 36.51 tonnes in Uruguay as of 2015.
- What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Malta and Uruguay?
- 1.77 tonnes, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
- Malta ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.