Latvia vs Singapore: What is wild fish catch used for?
Latvia
75.77 tonnes
in 2015
Singapore
75.02 tonnes
in 2015
Latvia rank
65th
Singapore rank
66th
What is wild fish catch used for? over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 75.77 tonnes against 75.02 tonnes in Singapore, a difference of 0.75 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Singapore ahead.
Latvia ranks 65th and Singapore ranks 66th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 54.4 tonnes | 1,034 tonnes | 979.85 tonnes | Singapore |
| 1960s | 224.43 tonnes | 738.58 tonnes | 514.14 tonnes | Singapore |
| 1970s | 656.28 tonnes | 1,851 tonnes | 1,195 tonnes | Singapore |
| 1980s | 620.69 tonnes | 1,906 tonnes | 1,285 tonnes | Singapore |
| 1990s | 280.45 tonnes | 1,254 tonnes | 973.2 tonnes | Singapore |
| 2000s | 293.56 tonnes | 413.81 tonnes | 120.25 tonnes | Singapore |
| 2010s | 168.93 tonnes | 139.09 tonnes | 29.84 tonnes | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Latvia or Singapore?
- Latvia, at 75.77 tonnes against 75.02 tonnes in Singapore as of 2015.
- What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Latvia and Singapore?
- 0.75 tonnes, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
- Latvia ranks 65th and Singapore ranks 66th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.