Japan vs South Africa: Wild fish allocation
Japan
27,928
in 2015
South Africa
28,842
in 2015
Japan rank
12th
South Africa rank
11th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Japan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28,842 against 27,928 in Japan, a difference of 914.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 46,267 | 151.97 | 46,115 | Japan |
| 1960s | 67,024 | 168.8 | 66,855 | Japan |
| 1970s | 125,419 | 370.63 | 125,049 | Japan |
| 1980s | 112,188 | 430.24 | 111,758 | Japan |
| 1990s | 109,240 | 2,622 | 106,617 | Japan |
| 2000s | 88,610 | 58,642 | 29,968 | Japan |
| 2010s | 48,395 | 30,728 | 17,667 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Japan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28,842 against 27,928 in Japan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Japan and South Africa?
- 914, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Africa?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Japan and South Africa rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Japan ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.