Iran vs New Zealand: Wild fish allocation
Iran
189.1
in 2015
New Zealand
184.51
in 2015
Iran rank
51st
New Zealand rank
52nd
Wild fish allocation over time
- Iran
- New Zealand
How they compare
Iran currently reports 189.1 against 184.51 in New Zealand, a difference of 4.59.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 86.75 | 35.69 | 51.05 | Iran |
| 1960s | 93.56 | 48.19 | 45.37 | Iran |
| 1970s | 99.2 | 72.94 | 26.26 | Iran |
| 1980s | 82.9 | 120.62 | 37.72 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 161.7 | 146.81 | 14.88 | Iran |
| 2000s | 127.47 | 148.32 | 20.85 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 156.34 | 149.2 | 7.14 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Iran or New Zealand?
- Iran, at 189.1 against 184.51 in New Zealand as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Iran and New Zealand?
- 4.59, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and New Zealand?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Iran and New Zealand rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Iran ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.