India vs South Africa: Wild fish allocation
India
18,625
in 2015
South Africa
28,842
in 2015
India rank
14th
South Africa rank
11th
Wild fish allocation over time
- India
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28,842 against 18,625 in India, a difference of 10,217.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.5 times India's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was India ahead.
India ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 11th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 292.76 | 151.97 | 140.78 | India |
| 1960s | 382.34 | 168.8 | 213.54 | India |
| 1970s | 3,448 | 370.63 | 3,077 | India |
| 1980s | 8,407 | 430.24 | 7,977 | India |
| 1990s | 12,657 | 2,622 | 10,035 | India |
| 2000s | 12,176 | 58,642 | 46,466 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 19,159 | 30,728 | 11,569 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, India or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28,842 against 18,625 in India as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between India and South Africa?
- 10,217, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and South Africa?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do India and South Africa rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- India ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 11th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.