Iceland vs New Zealand: Wild fish allocation
Iceland
209.88
in 2015
New Zealand
184.51
in 2015
Iceland rank
49th
New Zealand rank
52nd
Wild fish allocation over time
- Iceland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 209.88 against 184.51 in New Zealand, a difference of 25.37.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 138 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 175.79 | 35.69 | 140.1 | Iceland |
| 1960s | 195.45 | 48.19 | 147.26 | Iceland |
| 1970s | 232.72 | 72.94 | 159.78 | Iceland |
| 1980s | 343.03 | 120.62 | 222.41 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 310.22 | 146.81 | 163.41 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 264.39 | 148.32 | 116.07 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 226.26 | 149.2 | 77.06 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Iceland or New Zealand?
- Iceland, at 209.88 against 184.51 in New Zealand as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Iceland and New Zealand?
- 25.37, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Zealand?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Iceland and New Zealand rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Iceland ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.