Hong Kong, China vs Pakistan: Wild fish allocation
Hong Kong, China
3,719
in 2015
Pakistan
2,758
in 2015
Hong Kong, China rank
22nd
Pakistan rank
25th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Pakistan
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 3,719 against 2,758 in Pakistan, a difference of 961.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd and Pakistan ranks 25th of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 25.91 | 61.06 | 35.15 | Pakistan |
| 1960s | 44.98 | 622.92 | 577.94 | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 713.66 | 1,839 | 1,126 | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 1,679 | 3,133 | 1,454 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 5,179 | 2,165 | 3,014 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 4,963 | 1,945 | 3,018 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 3,963 | 2,251 | 1,712 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Hong Kong, China or Pakistan?
- Hong Kong, China, at 3,719 against 2,758 in Pakistan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Hong Kong, China and Pakistan?
- 961, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Pakistan?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Pakistan rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd and Pakistan ranks 25th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.