Hong Kong (China) vs Norway: Wild fish allocation
Hong Kong (China)
3,719
in 2015
Norway
2,790
in 2015
Hong Kong (China) rank
22nd
Norway rank
24th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 3,719 against 2,790 in Norway, a difference of 929.
That makes Hong Kong (China)'s figure about 1.3 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Norway ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 22nd and Norway ranks 24th of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 25.91 | 22,874 | 22,848 | Norway |
| 1960s | 44.98 | 20,548 | 20,503 | Norway |
| 1970s | 713.66 | 7,175 | 6,462 | Norway |
| 1980s | 1,679 | 27,360 | 25,681 | Norway |
| 1990s | 5,179 | 2,561 | 2,618 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2000s | 4,963 | 2,028 | 2,935 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2010s | 3,963 | 3,404 | 558.55 | Hong Kong (China) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Hong Kong (China) or Norway?
- Hong Kong (China), at 3,719 against 2,790 in Norway as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Hong Kong (China) and Norway?
- 929, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Norway?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Norway rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 22nd and Norway ranks 24th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.