Greenland vs South Africa: Wild fish allocation
Greenland
26,502
in 2015
South Africa
28,842
in 2015
Greenland rank
13th
South Africa rank
11th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Greenland
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28,842 against 26,502 in Greenland, a difference of 2,340.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was South Africa ahead.
Greenland ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 13.1 | 151.97 | 138.87 | South Africa |
| 1960s | 21.11 | 168.8 | 147.69 | South Africa |
| 1970s | 418.95 | 370.63 | 48.32 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 248.08 | 430.24 | 182.17 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 3,910 | 2,622 | 1,287 | Greenland |
| 2000s | 9,030 | 58,642 | 49,611 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 12,692 | 30,728 | 18,036 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Greenland or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28,842 against 26,502 in Greenland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Greenland and South Africa?
- 2,340, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and South Africa?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Greenland and South Africa rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Greenland ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.