Faroe Islands vs Sierra Leone: Wild fish allocation
Faroe Islands
67.64
in 2015
Sierra Leone
50.5
in 2015
Faroe Islands rank
70th
Sierra Leone rank
73rd
Wild fish allocation over time
- Faroe Islands
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 67.64 against 50.5 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 17.14.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.3 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 70th and Sierra Leone ranks 73rd of 140 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 40.46 | 20.9 | 19.55 | Faroe Islands |
| 1960s | 54.43 | 34.39 | 20.04 | Faroe Islands |
| 1970s | 55.69 | 36.97 | 18.72 | Faroe Islands |
| 1980s | 82.81 | 29.74 | 53.07 | Faroe Islands |
| 1990s | 74.92 | 22.4 | 52.53 | Faroe Islands |
| 2000s | 89.08 | 44.58 | 44.49 | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 67.55 | 44.62 | 22.93 | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Faroe Islands or Sierra Leone?
- Faroe Islands, at 67.64 against 50.5 in Sierra Leone as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Faroe Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 17.14, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Faroe Islands and Sierra Leone rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Faroe Islands ranks 70th and Sierra Leone ranks 73rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.