Curacao vs Falkland Islands: Wild fish allocation
Curacao
0.0073
in 2015
Falkland Islands
0.0179
in 2015
Curacao rank
136th
Falkland Islands rank
134th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Curacao
- Falkland Islands
How they compare
Falkland Islands currently reports 0.0179 against 0.0073 in Curacao, a difference of 0.0106.
That makes Falkland Islands's figure about 2.4 times Curacao's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 136th and Falkland Islands ranks 134th of 140 countries.
Falkland Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Falkland Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0099 | 0.017 | 0.0071 | Falkland Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0075 | 0.0143 | 0.0067 | Falkland Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Curacao or Falkland Islands?
- Falkland Islands, at 0.0179 against 0.0073 in Curacao as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Curacao and Falkland Islands?
- 0.0106, with Falkland Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Falkland Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Curacao and Falkland Islands rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Curacao ranks 136th and Falkland Islands ranks 134th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.