Croatia vs South Africa: Wild fish allocation
Croatia
31,278
in 2015
South Africa
28,842
in 2015
Croatia rank
10th
South Africa rank
11th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Croatia
- South Africa
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 31,278 against 28,842 in South Africa, a difference of 2,436.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was South Africa ahead.
Croatia ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 9.5 | 151.97 | 142.48 | South Africa |
| 1960s | 13.34 | 168.8 | 155.46 | South Africa |
| 1970s | 16.47 | 370.63 | 354.15 | South Africa |
| 1980s | 31.13 | 430.24 | 399.11 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 851.76 | 2,622 | 1,770 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 12,171 | 58,642 | 46,471 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 30,340 | 30,728 | 387.63 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Croatia or South Africa?
- Croatia, at 31,278 against 28,842 in South Africa as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Croatia and South Africa?
- 2,436, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and South Africa?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Croatia and South Africa rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Croatia ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.