Colombia vs El Salvador: Wild fish allocation
Colombia
8.77
in 2015
El Salvador
7.22
in 2015
Colombia rank
90th
El Salvador rank
91st
Wild fish allocation over time
- Colombia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 8.77 against 7.22 in El Salvador, a difference of 1.55.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was El Salvador ahead.
Colombia ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 91st of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 5 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.2 | 1.79 | 0.4101 | Colombia |
| 1960s | 18.85 | 4.08 | 14.77 | Colombia |
| 1970s | 15.16 | 4.79 | 10.37 | Colombia |
| 1980s | 15.89 | 3.18 | 12.71 | Colombia |
| 1990s | 14.22 | 7.02 | 7.2 | Colombia |
| 2000s | 9.43 | 9.45 | 0.0262 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 5.89 | 7.18 | 1.29 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Colombia or El Salvador?
- Colombia, at 8.77 against 7.22 in El Salvador as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Colombia and El Salvador?
- 1.55, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and El Salvador?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Colombia and El Salvador rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Colombia ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 91st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.