Cambodia vs Latvia: What is wild fish catch used for?

Cambodia
85.22 tonnes
in 2015
Latvia
75.77 tonnes
in 2015
Cambodia rank
63rd
Latvia rank
65th

What is wild fish catch used for? over time

  • Cambodia
  • Latvia
0200400600800195019822015

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 85.22 tonnes against 75.77 tonnes in Latvia, a difference of 9.45 tonnes.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Latvia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 65th of 140 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Latvia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.09 tonnes 324.66 tonnes 321.57 tonnes Latvia
1970s 3.33 tonnes 656.28 tonnes 652.96 tonnes Latvia
1980s 4.27 tonnes 620.69 tonnes 616.42 tonnes Latvia
1990s 32.87 tonnes 280.45 tonnes 247.59 tonnes Latvia
2000s 47.6 tonnes 293.56 tonnes 245.96 tonnes Latvia
2010s 79.53 tonnes 168.93 tonnes 89.4 tonnes Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Cambodia or Latvia?
Cambodia, at 85.22 tonnes against 75.77 tonnes in Latvia as of 2015.
What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Cambodia and Latvia?
9.45 tonnes, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Latvia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2015.
How do Cambodia and Latvia rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
Cambodia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 65th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
What is wild fish catch used for?
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
140 places, 8,720 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed