Barbados vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Wild fish allocation
Barbados
0.0594
in 2015
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0668
in 2015
Barbados rank
129th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
127th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Barbados
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0668 against 0.0594 in Barbados, a difference of 0.0074.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Barbados ranks 129th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th of 138 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0533 | 0.0249 | 0.0284 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.0754 | 0.0385 | 0.0369 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.066 | 0.0593 | 0.0066 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Barbados or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0668 against 0.0594 in Barbados as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0074, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
- How do Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Barbados ranks 129th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.