Barbados vs British Virgin Islands: Wild fish allocation
Barbados
0.0594
in 2015
British Virgin Islands
0.068
in 2015
Barbados rank
129th
British Virgin Islands rank
126th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Barbados
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.068 against 0.0594 in Barbados, a difference of 0.0086.
That makes British Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.
Barbados ranks 129th and British Virgin Islands ranks 126th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and British Virgin Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0533 | 0.0433 | 0.01 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.0754 | 0.0634 | 0.012 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.066 | 0.0694 | 0.0034 | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Barbados or British Virgin Islands?
- British Virgin Islands, at 0.068 against 0.0594 in Barbados as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Barbados and British Virgin Islands?
- 0.0086, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and British Virgin Islands?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
- How do Barbados and British Virgin Islands rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Barbados ranks 129th and British Virgin Islands ranks 126th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.