Bangladesh vs United Kingdom: Wild fish allocation
Bangladesh
359.4
in 2015
United Kingdom
297.59
in 2015
Bangladesh rank
42nd
United Kingdom rank
44th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Bangladesh
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 359.4 against 297.59 in United Kingdom, a difference of 61.81.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 42nd and United Kingdom ranks 44th of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 20.09 | 218.52 | 198.42 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 38.77 | 363.58 | 324.8 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 56.38 | 478.94 | 422.56 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 105.39 | 429.3 | 323.91 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 159.54 | 423.9 | 264.36 | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 262.52 | 294.17 | 31.65 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 346.51 | 282.19 | 64.33 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Bangladesh or United Kingdom?
- Bangladesh, at 359.4 against 297.59 in United Kingdom as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Bangladesh and United Kingdom?
- 61.81, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and United Kingdom?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and United Kingdom rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Bangladesh ranks 42nd and United Kingdom ranks 44th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.